This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: write recursive call

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Richard E Maine <Richard dot Maine at nasa dot gov>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Craig Powers <enigma at hal-pc dot org>, Pierre-Matthieu anglade <pierre dot matthieu dot anglade at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:01:29 +0100
Subject: Re: write recursive call
References: <25e63a4d0511240300g236e1aaeib7277db087197b49@mail.gmail.com> <1132833173.4385a9952e6ea@www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <25e63a4d0511240443l7cab4d07n62344f7db580717b@mail.gmail.com> <438AB0F2.80501@hal-pc.org> <19c433eb0511280047g7924ceebvd20e839a08d2c49c@mail.gmail.com> <aebd820ab98d01b2ebd21feeff1bda97@nasa.gov>

I've seen some run-time things that end up being controlled by the switch settings used for the main program.

This is the case for gfortran. Although, as you said, this choice has some cons, it's the best performance/usability ratio, I guess.

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: Pierre-Matthieu anglade

References:
- write recursive call
  - From: Pierre-Matthieu anglade
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: Tobias . Schlueter
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: Pierre-Matthieu anglade
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: Craig Powers
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: write recursive call
  - From: Richard E Maine

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]