This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Janne Blomqvist <jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi>, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:00:16 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
References: <20051119121719.GL31785@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051121210813.GD16758@vipunen.hut.fi> <43823878.9090700@gmail.com> <200511220001.25787.stevenb@suse.de> <20051122051201.GW31785@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051122052801.GA15174@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:28:01PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Can I consider this an approvement for gcc-4_1-branch then?
> > The patch for 4.1 is identical.
> 
> I think the answer should be "yes".  Mainline and 4.1 are
> essentially identical (except for your big patch).  The 
> longer that we can keep them in-sync, it will be easier 
> for us to maintain.  Of course, a bootstrap and regression
> test would be recommended.

Ok, tested and committed to gcc-4_1-branch as well.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: Janne Blomqvist
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]