This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argumentname

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>,"'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>,patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:00:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argumentname
References: <436FBC61.7040803@wanadoo.fr> <20051107220322.GA42003@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <436FDD78.4000906@wanadoo.fr> <436FE90C.5050208@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20051108001812.GA43159@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve,

Paul can you give Tobi a chance to read through the code. I certainly don't want to give the appearance of one person's approval trumping someone else. That would be a bad precedence to set.

It was my intention to let Tobi give his opinion.

Cheers

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argumentname
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argument name
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argument name
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argumentname
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argumentname
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24409 - ICE on module name vs dummy argument name
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]