This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> A library part? Can't you map complex(x,y) to > the appropriate cmplx(X,Y,some_kind) where X and > Y are properly converted to compatible types? COMPLEX doesn't need a library part, but I sent the diff of my whole current tree on my laptop since I'm a bit out of time (I'm supposed to be working :) It includes the other intrinsics, which have library parts. FX
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |