This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: about the compiler

From: Richard E Maine <Richard dot Maine at nasa dot gov>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: txdqpal ch <txdqpal at hotmail dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:28:32 -0800
Subject: Re: about the compiler
References: <BAY106-F26A32B56F2562428FC0250AB6B0@phx.gbl> <a8038889a51b0e5ce18e4bd5cd07def4@nasa.gov> <20051103174351.GA42057@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Nov 3, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:

I've answered this already (perhaps, in private email).
The code declares pb(3) and the do loop index goes from
1 to 4.  Thus, the OP assigns pb(4) = 0.0 in the loop,
which steps beyond on the end of the array.  In this
instance, ndim appears to occupy the memory that gets
stomped.

Jeez! I feel like an idiot for missing that obvious one, while looking at more obscure possibilities. Maybe I can plead that I'm not fully recovered from the cold that had me home the last several days; my brain isn't yet warmed up. :-(

--
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                            |        -- Mark Twain

References:
- Re: about the compiler
  - From: Richard E Maine
- Re: about the compiler
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]