This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal


On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 20:43 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:35:05PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > 
> > That just means your error recovery sucks :)
> 
> Grab the fortran code in PR 23538.
> Run it through gfortran and enjoy.
> 
> > Normally, things just put error_mark_node in the appropriate place and
> > move on until something checks error count.
> 
> gfortran frontend doesn't use the generic gcc error code.
> 
> No, I'm not going to rewrite gfortran's error/warning code
> to use gcc's generic code.

Okay, well, that's your prerogative.

You said:
"
> > > This is exactly what my patch does.  A warning becomes a fatal
> > > error.
> > 
> > No, it turns them into normal errors and not fatal errors.
> 
> I have not idea what you mean.  If I use "gfortran -Werror"
> with my patch, gfortran will exit when it hits the first 
> warning.  That appears to be fairly fatal.
"

I was simple explaining what he meant by normal error vs fatal error.

I don't care what gfortran does here.

--Dan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]