This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:38:10 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal
References: <20051031042600.GA22982@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200510310429.j9V4Tj1N012961@earth.phy.uc.edu>

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:29:45PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > 
I wrote:
> > I have not idea what you mean.  If I use "gfortran -Werror"
> > with my patch, gfortran will exit when it hits the first 
> > warning.  That appears to be fairly fatal.
> 
> I am trying to say that the behavior with -Werror on gcc,
> is that it turns warnings into errors and does not make
> them a fatal error.
> 

What's the point?  So, gcc prints "Error: " instead of
"Warning: ".

I'll remove the -Werror if it makes everyone happy.  All
I really care about is the ability to kill gfortran after
the first error.  Getting 438 errors from the code in
Pr 23538 is just insane.

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal
  - From: Paul Brook

References:
- Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH/fortran] Add option to make 1st error fatal
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]