This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A new bug?

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: klaus_ramstoeck at t-online dot de, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:59:45 +0200
Subject: Re: A new bug?
References: <200510141610.28602.klra67@freenet.de> <20051027180709.GA46160@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve,

Did you file a bug report for this in GCC's bugzilla?
Lahey's web base code checker suggests the code is legal.
I haven't thumbed through the standard to check the legality.
However, gfortran should never have an ICE.

That is indeed legal. The symbol rkqs in odeint should not be associated with the subroutine of the same name. For the moment, a workaround is, for example,

module ode90

contains

 subroutine odeint(rkqs_)
   external :: rkqs_
 end subroutine odeint

 subroutine rkqs()
 end subroutine rkqs

end module ode90

PaulT

References:
- A new bug?
  - From: klaus_ramstoeck
- Re: A new bug?
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]