This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: equivalence really broken :-)

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, GNU GFortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:05:21 -0400
Subject: Re: equivalence really broken :-)
References: <19c433eb0510140756q1e34032em65d020fa8208d6c6@mail.gmail.com> <434FDF78.4080109@wanadoo.fr>

On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Paul Thomas wrote:

François-Xavier,
PS: we should really work on an automated regtesting procedure that
includes code that isn't in the testsuite (mainly for copyright
reasons)
I agree - Polyhedron, Meissner and NIST all come to mind as candidates.

SPEC also comes to mind, even though most people don't have access to that. SPEC was also broken the same way as seen on http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/

-- Pinski

References:
- equivalence really broken :-)
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: equivalence really broken :-)
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]