This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Handle digits in %g, %| and %m argument

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:20:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle digits in %g, %| and %m argument
References: <20051010101212.GO22818@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <d23893ce80c7252f44c6266a4339f05c@physics.uc.edu>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:14:37AM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >Fortran uses -o %|.f95 in its specs, but without this patch the driver
> >treats this as %|.f followed immediately by 95.  Which means that
> >when the driver is creating the filename, it will create say
> >/tmp/ccjrY4pv.f as empty file, then cc1 will be called with
> >-o /tmp/ccjrY4pv.f95 etc. and afterwards we end up with an empty
> >left-over file /tmp/ccjrY4pv.f.
> >Ok for HEAD/4.0?
> 
> Isn't this the same patch as
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01289.html
> ?

Apparently it is.  Then the question is, can anyone approve
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01289.html for 4.0/HEAD?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Handle digits in %g, %| and %m argument
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] Handle digits in %g, %| and %m argument
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Handle digits in %g, %| and %m argument
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]