Re: -fno-automatic option (PR 20592)

[Richard E Maine <Richard dot Maine at nasa dot gov>]

On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
> How does this patch interact with ALLOCATABLE variables. Are they 
> deallocated
> at the end of the procedure or not? This needs testing and documenting.

I can't tell (haven't looked) at what behavior the patch in question 
would cause, but I can note that the standard *REQUIRES* deallocation 
for non-saved local allocatables. (Ones in modules are different). This 
is an area where it is not at the compiler's option. Thus making 
allocatables saved when not so declared is another way to break 
standard-conforming, working codes; they need to be one of the 
exceptions to such a switch.

--
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                            |        -- Mark Twain