This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

how to test library generation


I haven't yet understood how modifications in the .m4 files are propagated, and how they should be tested. I haven't found any Make option which causes changes in the m4 directory to be noticed.
I was concerned about propagating excessive source code unrolling into the complex variants; is that a problem?
Much of the library will not build with gcc-4.1, except at default options. I don't see much point in performance tests, without trying normal options, such as
-march=nocona -O2 -funroll-loops
which provokes repeated gcc 4.1 internal errors (not in the part I have been modifying).
gcc-4.0.2 is OK, but the library source which goes with that is different, and I think 4.0.2 misses optimization found by 4.1
When people say they want to verify ability to bootstrap, is that only with default options?



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]