This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
- From: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:21:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YmE//g09Dks5iEWzrccDi95Yx/zNGQMetQRH1b4sa6pp87q/TBF1kGiDtJBh4szc8KYNlxGPG52zEAZzhGlQGXDv5XwKOxF3pclZ2INGAM+Jq9xNzIU33EZIh3piJDJ4cKXgehRJ/nh6ttv2ScTyeWlAt7ejlmlwOaQdJYPYaIM=
- References: <20050730194708.GA5624@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
- Reply-to: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
> I've finally found some time to review Janne's implementation
> of the F2003 flush command.
Very nice!
> (1) Should we implement IOMSG before committing Janne's patch?
>
> (2) Can I commit Janne's patch with an appropriate TODO comment?
I'd go for (2). F2003 is nice, but seeing the rather large number of
bugs on gfortran's plate, I don't think F2003 features are high
priority.
FX
PS: Steve, I'll be back to real life on August, 2nd. If you have time
to review the large kinds patch, I'll be available on IRC and via mail
at that time if you have any question.