This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: thanks
- From: Mike Kumbera <kumbera1 at llnl dot gov>
- To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:39:56 -0700
- Subject: Re: thanks
- References: <20050730051259.5D8981DC154@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
The bug is in the test program cp_test.f90. NOT in gfortran or the
gnu backend. It allows reordering that breaks the "success"
conditional under high optimization levels.
Mike
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:12:59AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Mike,
> So are you saying the cp_test.f90 test program exposes flaws in
> the gcc 4.1 optimization or that the test program should have been
> preventing reordering all along? If it is the former, are your sure
> we should be masking these bugs just in case they are optimization
> flaws that no other testsuite test exposes?
> Jack