This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: what is the status of gfortran w.r.t. lapack?
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Kamaraju Kusumanchi <kamaraju at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:37:06 -0700
- Subject: Re: what is the status of gfortran w.r.t. lapack?
- References: <ba49751505072012284bd9635d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:28:15PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Just wondering if gfortran is able to compile & run all tests of
> lapack without any hiccups? I searched in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran with the word lapack and found
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
>
> which say 272 tests have failed. But this was updated on May 27. Any
> progress made after that? How does this compare with g95? My intention
> is not to raise a flamewar between these two, but to use a compiler
> which will compile the lapack suite.
>
> I dont know any other websites which list this information.
>
> Can anyone please comment/help on this?
>
troutmask:sgk[205] grep -i fail *out
csep.out: CST drivers: 2 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST: 1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST drivers: 1 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
troutmask:sgk[206] gfc --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.2 20050719 (prerelease))
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
These are the only failures I see in theLAPACK tests where I use
both the BLAS and LAPACK from netlib. Everything is compiled
with "-O -march=opteron" flags. All BLAS tests pass.
--
Steve