fortran archive
author index for July, 2005

This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

François-Xavier Coudert

• 2005-07-03 20:47 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-04 16:46 Re: PR 20842: Testcase broken?
• 2005-07-05 20:03 Leaving town
• 2005-07-22 20:43 Re: redirection in gfortran and g95
• 2005-07-24 08:17 Re: Mainline vs 4.0 Branch, IEEE exceptionals
• 2005-07-24 08:36 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
• 2005-07-24 08:41 Re: [gfortran,patch] Front-end and library support for large integer and real kinds
• 2005-07-25 13:35 Re: Severe problem with formatted write
• 2005-07-27 21:34 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 15:39 Re: Large number of new Fortran failures on AIX
• 2005-07-28 15:55 Re: Large number of new Fortran failures on AIX
• 2005-07-28 17:26 Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do?
• 2005-07-30 10:41 Re: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)
• 2005-07-30 10:51 Re: [gfortran,patch] PR libfortran/22436
• 2005-07-30 20:21 Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-31 07:31 [gfortran] patch for PR libfortran/21787

Tobias Schlüter

• 2005-07-03 15:36 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-04 19:43 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 20:32 Re: [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to contained procedures
• 2005-07-04 20:59 Re: [PATCH] Allow omitting parentheses for ENTRY even in FUNCTIONs
• 2005-07-06 21:56 Re: [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 21594
• 2005-07-07 21:38 Re: [PATCH] Fix use of ENTRY names as rvalues
• 2005-07-07 22:03 [gfortran, committed] Re: Inconsistency between trans-types.c andlibgfortran.h
• 2005-07-09 12:07 Re: [patch, fortran] Fix for PR 18022
• 2005-07-10 09:39 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-10 15:09 Re: [PATCH] Fix gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 (take 2)
• 2005-07-10 20:18 Re: [gfortran] Patch for pr20363
• 2005-07-10 20:19 Re: [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for
• 2005-07-10 21:09 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-10 21:17 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Fix bug triggered by NIST fm908.for - x-formattingbeyond eor during read
• 2005-07-11 20:32 Re: [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for - redux
• 2005-07-11 22:30 Re: g95 compiler error
• 2005-07-11 22:32 Re: [PATCH] libgfortran format conversion bug (PR libgfortran/22412)
• 2005-07-13 19:04 Re: [PATCH] Fix fortran file left but not entered warning (PR fortran/22417)
• 2005-07-13 19:21 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-13 20:33 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR16435 and NIST fm908.for
• 2005-07-13 21:07 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR16435 and NIST fm908.for
• 2005-07-13 21:17 Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded limit on max error message length
• 2005-07-14 08:39 Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded limit on max error message length
• 2005-07-16 16:09 Re: Possible fix for 18452
• 2005-07-17 11:57 Re: 4.0.2/4.1 PATCH: Support LP64 targets without <stdint.h> in libgfortran
• 2005-07-17 12:02 Re: [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-17 12:28 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-22 13:46 Re: gfortran triumphs with wrong code
• 2005-07-26 08:26 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?

Tobias SchlÃter

• 2005-07-01 17:08 Re: [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to contained procedures
• 2005-07-17 18:45 Re: [Patch, fortran] latent bug in dump-parse-tree.c

François-Xavier Coudert

• 2005-07-28 15:37 Fwd: help: Problem in testing patch for gfortan

Andreas Jaeger

• 2005-07-01 05:44 Two small patches for gfortran warnings
• 2005-07-04 05:58 PR 20842: Testcase broken?
• 2005-07-22 05:49 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings

Andreas Schwab

• 2005-07-13 13:34 Parallel build fix
• 2005-07-23 06:54 Re: [PATCH, final] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-25 22:01 [PATCH] Fix fortran install rule

Andreas Voellmy

• 2005-07-08 03:21 Newbie question on gfortran status
• 2005-07-28 14:37 Fortran testing strategies

Andrew Pinski

• 2005-07-02 20:26 Re: 'loc()' in gfortran
• 2005-07-04 20:25 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 20:40 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-08 17:21 Re: DATA statement bug?
• 2005-07-13 17:35 Re: Regression in gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/elemental.f90
• 2005-07-14 21:07 GCC and types, a request for help
• 2005-07-16 06:10 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-19 03:02 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 17:23 Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DATA range constructors of CHARACTER arrays
• 2005-07-20 05:21 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format
• 2005-07-22 20:30 Re: New Fortran regression
• 2005-07-23 05:05 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-28 03:35 Re: -bind_at_load
• 2005-07-28 04:25 Re: gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-28 04:27 Re: gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-28 19:48 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do?
• 2005-07-30 19:47 Re: CREAD buggy?

Asher Langton

• 2005-07-06 22:22 Re: 'loc()' in gfortran
• 2005-07-08 00:18 Re: 'loc()' in gfortran
• 2005-07-08 17:14 DATA statement bug?
• 2005-07-08 17:35 Re: DATA statement bug?
• 2005-07-16 00:56 Possible fix for 18452
• 2005-07-26 18:02 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-28 04:20 gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-28 16:30 Re: gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-29 22:25 [PATCH] Cray Pointers
• 2005-07-30 20:30 Re: thanks
• 2005-07-31 17:34 Re: [PATCH] Cray Pointers

Bill Northcott

• 2005-07-06 23:54 gfortran on MacOS X

Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)

• 2005-07-21 00:54 RE: what is the status of gfortran w.r.t. lapack?

Bowyer, Clifton C

• 2005-07-11 22:15 g95 compiler error

Brooks Moses

• 2005-07-08 05:40 Re: Logicals and .EQ.
• 2005-07-10 20:09 Re: [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for
• 2005-07-18 04:28 Re: [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-18 05:10 Re: [patch, fix - testcase] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values - regression
• 2005-07-18 05:31 Re: gfortran documentation
• 2005-07-19 01:10 [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortran index.html
• 2005-07-19 01:30 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortranindex.html
• 2005-07-28 17:53 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-31 20:14 Re: what is correct output?

Canqun Yang

• 2005-07-20 14:26 Function Inlining for FORTRAN
• 2005-07-22 02:27 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN

Craig Powers

• 2005-07-08 04:14 Logicals and .EQ.
• 2005-07-23 06:35 Re: redirection in gfortran and g95

Daniel Berlin

• 2005-07-19 17:17 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-22 16:04 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-23 13:53 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-28 18:03 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do?

Daniel Franke

• 2005-07-04 18:08 bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 18:58 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 19:50 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 19:57 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 20:24 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 22:37 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2005-07-25 13:09 Re: gfortran - gdb problem
• 2005-07-26 03:18 Re: gfortran - gdb problem
• 2005-07-26 13:06 Re: gfortran - gdb problem

David Edelsohn

• 2005-07-11 22:22 [PATCH] libgfortran format conversion bug (PR libgfortran/22412)
• 2005-07-13 17:38 [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-13 18:56 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-14 03:47 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-15 15:38 [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-15 19:11 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-15 19:19 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-16 03:34 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-17 21:19 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-21 02:33 [PATCH, fortran] reduce character array parameters (PR fortran/22491)
• 2005-07-22 04:53 [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 13:25 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 13:44 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 14:55 Re: [PATCH, fortran] reduce character array parameters (PR fortran/22491)
• 2005-07-22 15:08 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 16:29 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 20:00 [PATCH, fortran] character array and constant substrings
• 2005-07-23 03:12 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character array and constant substrings
• 2005-07-28 13:58 Large number of new Fortran failures on AIX
• 2005-07-28 15:45 Re: Large number of new Fortran failures on AIX
• 2005-07-28 17:48 Re: Large number of new Fortran failures on AIX

David Lecomber

• 2005-07-26 06:57 Re: gfortran - gdb problem

Diego Novillo

• 2005-07-08 03:27 Re: Newbie question on gfortran status

Dominique Dhumieres

• 2005-07-26 07:31 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 14:35 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 18:28 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot

Emil Block

• 2005-07-03 21:30 Do loop and strange behavior
• 2005-07-26 02:54 [Fwd: Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic]
• 2005-07-27 21:00 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files
• 2005-07-28 14:10 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files

Erik Edelmann

• 2005-07-01 09:48 Re: PR 19925 and expansion of array constructors
• 2005-07-07 23:47 [gfortran] Patch for pr20363
• 2005-07-11 19:47 Re: [gfortran] Patch for pr20363
• 2005-07-12 09:17 Re: [gfortran] Patch for pr20363

Erik Schnetter

• 2005-07-17 12:39 Memory and disk layout of real*10 variables
• 2005-07-17 19:20 Re: Memory and disk layout of real*10 variables

Feng Wang

• 2005-07-01 10:13 [Patch Modified] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-04 14:10 Re: [Patch Modified] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-07 02:08 [patch, committed] Fix PR22327 (Re: array constructor)
• 2005-07-07 02:56 Re: [patch, committed] Fix PR22327 (Re: array constructor)
• 2005-07-07 08:08 [Patch, Committed] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-10 14:46 Can you commit this to gcc-4.0?
• 2005-07-11 06:40 re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 09:24 Re: Can you commit this to gcc-4.0?
• 2005-07-11 09:30 Re: Can you commit this to gcc-4.0?
• 2005-07-11 09:30 Re: Can you commit this to gcc-4.0?
• 2005-07-11 17:14 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-12 00:33 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-14 02:11 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-14 03:00 re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-16 06:34 Re: [Patch] Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag
• 2005-07-17 07:34 Re: [Patch] Enable Hollerith constant and character array in format tag
• 2005-07-23 03:11 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character array and constant substrings
• 2005-07-23 03:15 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character array and constant substrings

FX Coudert

• 2005-07-03 01:01 Re: [gfortran,patch] PR fortran/20842
• 2005-07-03 01:05 Re: Warning/error mechanism in libgfortran
• 2005-07-03 01:46 Re: [gfortran,patch] PR fortran/20842
• 2005-07-04 18:39 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 19:30 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 20:07 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 20:35 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-04 21:20 Re: bug? runtime error passing POD
• 2005-07-19 07:37 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 08:46 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
• 2005-07-19 16:55 [gfortran,patch] PR libfortran/22436
• 2005-07-19 17:15 [gfortran,patch] Front-end and library support for large integerand real kinds

Geoffrey Keating

• 2005-07-28 19:10 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2005-07-25 10:49 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-31 22:29 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-31 23:16 Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
• 2005-07-31 23:19 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortranindex.html

Harald Anlauf

• 2005-07-13 20:53 Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-19 20:43 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-19 21:40 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values

Jack Howarth

• 2005-07-21 15:41 redirection in gfortran and g95
• 2005-07-26 00:27 does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 01:50 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 01:55 format bug
• 2005-07-26 02:09 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 02:46 which branch should I use?
• 2005-07-26 03:33 Re: which branch should I use?
• 2005-07-26 03:51 no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-26 23:17 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-27 03:37 RE: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-27 12:50 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-27 13:04 -bind_at_load
• 2005-07-28 00:10 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 01:30 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 03:08 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 03:12 RE: -bind_at_load
• 2005-07-28 14:10 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 14:15 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 15:37 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 20:27 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 20:46 Re: no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot
• 2005-07-28 23:48 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-29 00:54 Re: gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-29 13:01 RE: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-30 02:58 Re: thanks
• 2005-07-30 05:16 Re: thanks
• 2005-07-30 18:24 CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 18:25 RE: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 19:09 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 19:45 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 20:58 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 21:02 Re: thanks
• 2005-07-31 00:04 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 00:53 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 01:24 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 01:39 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 19:46 what is correct output?

Jakub Jelinek

• 2005-07-04 20:36 [PATCH] Allow omitting parentheses for ENTRY even in FUNCTIONs
• 2005-07-07 11:59 [PATCH] Fix use of ENTRY names as rvalues
• 2005-07-07 15:16 [PATCH] Don't ICE on invalid preprocessor lines
• 2005-07-07 15:22 [PATCH] Fix handling of long preprocessor lines
• 2005-07-07 23:28 Fortran patch ping
• 2005-07-12 09:09 [PATCH] Fix fortran file left but not entered warning (PR fortran/22417)
• 2005-07-12 09:12 [PATCH] Remove hardcoded limit on max error message length
• 2005-07-14 07:29 Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded limit on max error message length
• 2005-07-19 16:12 [PATCH] Fix Fortran DATA range constructors of CHARACTER arrays
• 2005-07-25 21:06 [PATCH] Fix equivalence handling (PRs fortran/18833, fortran/20850)

Janis Johnson

• 2005-07-28 22:38 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do?
• 2005-07-28 22:47 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.

Janne Blomqvist

• 2005-07-01 05:16 Re: matmul intrinsic procedure
• 2005-07-10 21:48 [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-12 17:40 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-12 17:53 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-17 19:02 Re: Memory and disk layout of real*10 variables
• 2005-07-18 06:56 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-18 07:00 Re: Memory and disk layout of real*10 variables
• 2005-07-19 20:01 Re: Mark PR 20406 as WONTFIX?
• 2005-07-19 20:17 Re: Warning/error mechanism in libgfortran

Jatin Bhateja, Noida

• 2005-07-20 18:41 RE: Function inlining for Fortran

Jerry DeLisle

• 2005-07-02 00:50 [patch, committed] gfortran.texi and invoke.texi
• 2005-07-02 03:23 [fortran, committed] Documentation for intrinsics
• 2005-07-08 01:19 NIST Update
• 2005-07-08 06:43 PR21875 - on the trail
• 2005-07-09 07:11 [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-09 07:57 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-09 20:05 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-09 23:43 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-10 20:56 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-14 07:00 [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-15 03:29 Re: transfer of the record length for io from internal files
• 2005-07-17 21:11 Re: [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-17 22:28 Re: [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-17 22:50 Re: [patch, fix] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-17 23:09 Re: [patch, fix - testcase] Formatted output of IEEE exceptionalvalues - regression
• 2005-07-18 00:14 Re: [patch, fix - testcase] Formatted output of IEEE exceptionalvalues - regression
• 2005-07-18 13:27 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values - resolution
• 2005-07-19 02:55 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 23:58 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-20 00:01 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-20 02:55 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-20 05:04 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ formatspecifiers
• 2005-07-20 05:26 [PATCH] Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-20 05:32 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format
• 2005-07-23 00:44 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 06:27 [PATCH, final] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-23 06:51 [PATCH, gfortran] Revised BN, BZ test case
• 2005-07-23 07:14 Re: [PATCH, final] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-24 00:54 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Revised BN, BZ test case
• 2005-07-24 03:08 Mainline vs 4.0 Branch, IEEE exceptionals
• 2005-07-24 06:06 Re: Mainline vs 4.0 Branch, IEEE exceptionals
• 2005-07-24 06:24 Re: [PATCH, final] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-26 01:10 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 02:10 Re: format bug
• 2005-07-26 02:24 Re: format bug
• 2005-07-26 03:19 Re: format bug
• 2005-07-27 03:58 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-27 04:24 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-27 05:01 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 02:48 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-29 20:19 Re: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702,i686-pc-mingw32)
• 2005-07-29 20:42 Re: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702,i686-pc-mingw32)
• 2005-07-31 00:42 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 02:14 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 02:19 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 06:36 PR23154 Re: CREAD buggy? Can't reproduce the problem

Joseph S. Myers

• 2005-07-03 00:48 Re: [PATCH]: Add fortran dir specific format attribute "gcc_gfc"
• 2005-07-22 16:08 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings

Julien Lancien

• 2005-07-07 15:05 Re: Some questions about gfortran.

Justin Thomas

• 2005-07-12 22:10 gfortran documentation

Kamaraju Kusumanchi

• 2005-07-20 19:29 what is the status of gfortran w.r.t. lapack?
• 2005-07-22 04:09 gfortran - gdb problem

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2005-07-03 13:02 Re: [PATCH]: Add fortran dir specific format attribute "gcc_gfc"

Kazu Hirata

• 2005-07-03 18:41 [patch] fortran/*: Fix comment/doc typos.

Manfred Hollstein

• 2005-07-24 10:32 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!

Michael Matz

• 2005-07-22 14:11 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN

Mike Kumbera

• 2005-07-30 04:05 Re: thanks
• 2005-07-30 06:40 Re: thanks

Paul Brook

• 2005-07-01 12:25 Re: PR 19925 and expansion of array constructors
• 2005-07-08 17:14 Fwd: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes
• 2005-07-10 21:52 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-15 15:23 Re: Fix PR21034
• 2005-07-20 15:24 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
• 2005-07-21 01:25 Re: [patch] for PR 19362
• 2005-07-22 02:37 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
• 2005-07-22 14:16 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 14:35 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-27 12:56 Re: Fortran 90 compiler software
• 2005-07-30 19:46 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 20:36 Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-31 02:20 Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-31 15:20 Re: [PATCH] Cray Pointers
• 2005-07-31 18:00 Re: [PATCH] Cray Pointers
• 2005-07-31 23:11 Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries

Paul Stodghill

• 2005-07-12 18:50 Recommended way of calling C functions from gfortran

Paul THOMAS

• 2005-07-01 11:52 [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to containedprocedures
• 2005-07-02 08:50 Re: [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to contained procedures
• 2005-07-03 13:44 Re: [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to contained procedures
• 2005-07-03 20:11 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-04 04:58 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-07 04:33 Re: [patch, committed] Fix PR22327 (Re: array constructor)
• 2005-07-08 21:33 [patch, fortran] Fix for PR 18022
• 2005-07-10 19:46 [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for
• 2005-07-10 21:06 [Patch, libgfortran] Fix bug triggered by NIST fm908.for - x-formattingbeyond eor during read
• 2005-07-10 21:16 Re: [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for
• 2005-07-11 19:37 [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for - redux
• 2005-07-11 19:57 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Fix bug triggered by NIST fm908.for - x-formattingbeyondeor during read
• 2005-07-11 20:13 Re: [patch,libgfortran] Fix NIST fm906.for - redux
• 2005-07-12 05:51 PR15966 - internal IO to arrays
• 2005-07-12 17:01 [Patch, libgfortran] PR16435 and NIST fm908.for
• 2005-07-12 22:30 gfortran documentation
• 2005-07-13 17:25 Regression in gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/elemental.f90
• 2005-07-13 17:28 Re: Regression in gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/elemental.f90
• 2005-07-13 20:56 Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR16435 and NIST fm908.for
• 2005-07-13 22:22 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-14 15:58 Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-14 20:54 transfer of the record length for io from internal files
• 2005-07-15 04:28 Re: transfer of the record length for io from internal files
• 2005-07-15 04:32 Re: transfer of the record length for io from internal files
• 2005-07-15 17:45 Re: [Patch] Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin formattag
• 2005-07-15 17:45 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-16 06:02 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-16 06:19 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-16 08:11 Re: [Patch] Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin formattag
• 2005-07-17 09:36 Re: [Patch] Enable Hollerith constant and character array in formattag
• 2005-07-17 16:51 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-17 17:06 [Patch, fortran] latent bug in dump-parse-tree.c
• 2005-07-17 19:28 Re: [Patch, fortran] latent bug in dump-parse-tree.c
• 2005-07-17 22:15 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-19 05:41 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 12:00 [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to containedprocedures- redux++
• 2005-07-19 12:05 [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to containedprocedures - redux++
• 2005-07-19 19:57 Re: Mark PR 20406 as WONTFIX?
• 2005-07-20 19:07 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in textoutput.
• 2005-07-20 19:13 Re: Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-20 22:02 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in textoutput.
• 2005-07-21 05:33 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in textoutput.
• 2005-07-23 14:06 Severe problem with formatted write
• 2005-07-23 16:39 [Patch, testsuite] Regression in 4.02 testsuite - io_invalid_1.f90
• 2005-07-24 11:05 Re: NIST bugs
• 2005-07-25 16:58 Re: Severe problem with formatted write
• 2005-07-26 17:49 [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 04:13 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-29 14:59 [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-30 06:23 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.

pedro albarran

• 2005-07-03 11:53 DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 16:17 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 16:37 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 20:38 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 21:43 Re: [Fwd: Do loop and strange behavior]

Pieter Haasbroek

• 2005-07-27 12:38 Fortran 90 compiler software

Richard E Maine

• 2005-07-27 15:09 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files
• 2005-07-27 17:56 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files
• 2005-07-27 21:17 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files

Richard Henderson

• 2005-07-19 18:21 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-21 20:06 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
• 2005-07-23 17:08 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 17:31 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!

ron Young

• 2005-07-20 18:35 Re: Function inlining for Fortran

Salvatore Filippone

• 2005-07-06 16:16 array constructor
• 2005-07-06 16:55 Re: array constructor

Stephan Siemen

• 2005-07-01 15:01 'loc()' in gfortran

Steve Edwards

• 2005-07-25 12:31 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-25 16:30 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-27 11:27 Appending data to pre-exisiting files
• 2005-07-27 16:45 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files

Steve Ellcey

• 2005-07-14 20:52 Patch for IA64 HP-UX Fortran build failure
• 2005-07-14 21:12 Re: Patch for IA64 HP-UX Fortran build failure

Steve Kargl

• 2005-07-01 18:43 Re: 'loc()' in gfortran
• 2005-07-03 14:56 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 16:30 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-03 20:23 Re: DO-loop and WRITE strange behaviour
• 2005-07-06 16:48 Re: array constructor
• 2005-07-06 22:30 Re: 'loc()' in gfortran
• 2005-07-07 02:38 Re: [patch, committed] Fix PR22327 (Re: array constructor)
• 2005-07-08 04:01 Re: Newbie question on gfortran status
• 2005-07-08 05:26 Re: Logicals and .EQ.
• 2005-07-08 05:34 Re: Logicals and .EQ.
• 2005-07-09 20:26 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-10 21:24 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-10 22:26 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-11 02:05 [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 02:44 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 03:38 Re: ICE in tree.c
• 2005-07-11 03:52 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 16:25 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 18:02 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-11 21:16 Re: [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 21593
• 2005-07-11 22:19 Re: g95 compiler error
• 2005-07-12 17:38 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-12 17:40 Re: [PATCH, gfortran] Fix initialization of arrays of strings
• 2005-07-13 18:53 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-16 14:39 Re: [Relemental.f90 failure, was [FC, fortran] Output contained namespaces
• 2005-07-16 15:01 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-16 15:05 Re: [PATCH, fortran] character length (PR fortran/21730)
• 2005-07-16 16:02 Re: [patch, fortran/libgfortran] Fix PR22390 (FLUSH statement)
• 2005-07-16 16:16 Re: gfortran documentation
• 2005-07-16 19:40 Bandaid patch
• 2005-07-16 19:41 Re: Bandaid patch
• 2005-07-17 23:33 Re: [patch, fix - testcase] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values - regression
• 2005-07-18 05:54 Re: gfortran documentation
• 2005-07-19 02:31 Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 02:45 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 03:11 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 17:31 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 17:34 Re: [gfortran,patch] Front-end and library support for large integer and real kinds
• 2005-07-19 18:32 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-19 21:32 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-19 22:11 Re: Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-20 23:37 Re: what is the status of gfortran w.r.t. lapack?
• 2005-07-22 06:42 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 23:12 Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 00:53 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 05:02 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 14:30 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 17:17 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 18:36 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-24 01:10 Re: [PATCH, final] Formatted output of IEEE exceptional values
• 2005-07-25 16:15 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
• 2005-07-26 01:49 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 01:52 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 02:18 Re: does gfortran backport any g95 code?
• 2005-07-26 03:21 Re: which branch should I use?
• 2005-07-28 04:59 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues.
• 2005-07-28 16:13 Re: Appending data to pre-exisiting files
• 2005-07-28 17:41 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do?
• 2005-07-30 18:44 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 19:39 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-30 19:47 F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-30 21:05 Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-30 21:13 Re: F2003's IOMSG feature and Janne's FLUSH patch
• 2005-07-31 01:29 Re: CREAD buggy?
• 2005-07-31 23:23 Re: [docs] Add link to gfortran wiki for binaries
• 2005-07-31 23:36 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortran index.html

Steven Bosscher

• 2005-07-03 13:37 Re: [PATCH]: Add fortran dir specific format attribute "gcc_gfc"
• 2005-07-04 11:11 Re: [Patch Modified] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-04 11:15 Re: [Patch Modified] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-07 11:31 Re: [Patch, Committed] re: Enable Hollerith constant and character arrayin format tag (take 3).
• 2005-07-07 15:31 Re: [PATCH] Don't ICE on invalid preprocessor lines
• 2005-07-07 15:37 Re: [PATCH] Fix handling of long preprocessor lines
• 2005-07-08 05:57 Re: [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 22217
• 2005-07-14 20:55 Re: Patch for IA64 HP-UX Fortran build failure
• 2005-07-19 12:08 Re: [patch, fortran] PR16940 - module interfaces to contained procedures - redux++
• 2005-07-19 21:39 Re: Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-19 22:07 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-20 15:58 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
• 2005-07-20 16:38 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-20 16:49 Re: [Bug libfortran/16435] gfortran X edit descriptor failure: test f77-edit-x-out.f
• 2005-07-20 18:43 Re: Function inlining for Fortran
• 2005-07-20 18:57 Re: Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-20 20:00 Re: Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-20 20:03 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
• 2005-07-20 20:16 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
• 2005-07-20 20:46 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
• 2005-07-20 20:49 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
• 2005-07-20 23:33 Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DATA range constructors of CHARACTER arrays
• 2005-07-21 10:12 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in t extoutput
• 2005-07-21 10:53 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in t extoutput
• 2005-07-21 23:45 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in t extoutput
• 2005-07-22 09:06 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in t extoutput
• 2005-07-22 13:28 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 14:08 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 14:10 Re: [PATCH, fortran] reduce character array parameters (PR fortran/22491)
• 2005-07-22 14:18 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-22 17:05 Re: [PATCH, fortran] Simplify constant substrings
• 2005-07-26 21:34 [patch] Don't accept -fno-{fixed,free}-form
• 2005-07-26 23:19 Re: [patch] Fix PR/22503: Suggest to use .EQV. when comparing logicals with .EQ.
• 2005-07-28 09:07 Re: gfc_array_range_type being garbage collected?
• 2005-07-28 11:11 Re: [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues - ping
• 2005-07-30 11:04 Re: [gfortran,patch] PR libfortran/22436
• 2005-07-31 20:35 [patch] Improve code generation for assigned goto statements
• 2005-07-31 21:41 [patch] Add a few simple attributes to some of the library functions

Thomas Koenig

• 2005-07-04 22:09 [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 21594
• 2005-07-08 05:41 [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 22217
• 2005-07-09 14:43 Re: [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 22217
• 2005-07-10 21:42 Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] Fix PR21875 (FM111.f) BN and BZ format specifiers
• 2005-07-11 20:52 [patch, libfortran] Fix for PR 21593
• 2005-07-15 20:52 [Patch, committed] Fix 18857 and 21926 in 4.0
• 2005-07-16 09:10 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-17 19:19 [patch, committed] Fix PR 21480 for 4.0
• 2005-07-18 17:43 [patch, committed] Fix libgfortran/21333 for 4.0
• 2005-07-19 18:36 [patch, committed] Fix PR libfortran/21593 for 4.0
• 2005-07-19 18:40 Mark PR 20406 as WONTFIX?
• 2005-07-22 20:24 New Fortran regression
• 2005-07-23 06:29 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again!
• 2005-07-23 06:41 Re: redirection in gfortran and g95
• 2005-07-29 21:58 [patch, committed] Fix testcase matmul_1.f90
• 2005-07-30 22:01 [Patch, committed] Fix some wrong testcases in gfortran.dg

THOMAS Paul Richard 169137

• 2005-07-07 11:38 Re: gfortran on MacOS X + PR17917
• 2005-07-15 06:36 Re: transfer of the record length for io from internal files
• 2005-07-19 07:31 Re: [RFC, fortran] Output contained namespaces in module (PR fortran/16861)
• 2005-07-19 12:24 gfortran triumphs with wrong code
• 2005-07-20 09:36 Re: Patches relating to NIST io formatting failures and PR16435
• 2005-07-21 07:46 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in textoutput
• 2005-07-21 09:10 Re: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in textoutput
• 2005-07-21 13:37 RE: [Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in t extoutput
• 2005-07-28 08:29 [patch, gfortran] pr22570 and related issues - ping

Tillmann Wegst

• 2005-07-29 18:06 real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)
• 2005-07-29 21:51 Re: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

Tobias . Schlueter

• 2005-07-28 14:57 Re: Fortran testing strategies
• 2005-07-28 15:42 Re: Fwd: help: Problem in testing patch for gfortan

Volker Reichelt

• 2005-07-26 23:15 [patch] Fix PR/22503: Suggest to use .EQV. when comparing logicalswith .EQ.
• 2005-07-27 08:47 Re: [patch] Fix PR/22503: Suggest to use .EQV. when comparing logicalswith .EQ.

Wu Zhou

• 2005-07-21 07:47 [GDB & Fortran]: common block's DWARF representation and "infocommon" output
• 2005-07-25 05:47 Re: [GDB & Fortran]: common block's DWARF representation and "infocommon" output
• 2005-07-25 06:34 Re: [GDB & Fortran]: common block's DWARF representation and "infocommon" output
• 2005-07-25 07:31 Re: gfortran - gdb problem
• 2005-07-26 03:05 Re: gfortran - gdb problem
• 2005-07-26 09:00 Re: gfortran - gdb problem
• 2005-07-28 03:43 Re: gfortran - gdb problem

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)