This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Bug fortran/20178] COMPLEX function returns incompatible withg77
- From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- To: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: GCC Fortran mailing list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 20:10:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug fortran/20178] COMPLEX function returns incompatible withg77
- References: <20050223185848.20178.stevenj@fftw.org> <20050515113302.18794.qmail@sourceware.org> <428B2400.8040607@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>>>------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 22:23 -------
>>>Fixed on the mainline. I will commit this to the branch after the obligatory
>>>testing and the necessary changes (unfortunately -fsecond-underscore became the
>>>default on the branch).
>>
>>
>>[ Sorry for the late reply ]
>>
>>I wonder if that really means we have to stick to -fsecond-underscore on
>>the 4.0 branch. Only 4.0.0 is out, and it is very probable that
>>*nobody* uses it for any serious work in Fortran anyway.
>>
>>I feel we can safely change the default, even on the branch.
>
>
> I'm also inclined to doing this, 4.0.1 will probably be vastly more usable
> than 4.0, but I'd still like to get feedback from the list. It's really a
> minor incompatibility. Especially since a lot of people seem to use
> '-fno-second-underscore'.
I'll commit this during the week, unless somebody objects. Toon's approval
together with no objections so far is enough for me, but I wanted to give
everybody a last chance to object.
- Tobi