This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
Paul Thomas wrote:
>>- I don't expect new types to be added to gfortran soon
>>- new types will most probably not require string length information
>>- the code ~10 lines above this hunk does exactly what you suggest
>
> Even fortran 2003 will not require the introduction of new intrinsic
> types, will it?
It introduces objects, but I doubt that a string length will be part of
transferring them.
- Tobi
- References:
- [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)