This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: one more!!
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:12 -0500, apaz@purdue.edu wrote:
> Thanks, I was asking about the best way to go in mixing Fortran and C/Objective
> C (in both directions) ?
>
<delurk>
mixing fortran and c is quite a nightmare. actually, i would consider
this a rather good reason not to use fortran. but hey, i guess we don't
have an option.
i've used cfortran.h [1] in the past. it works quite well. i haven't
tried it with gfortran.
something even more off-topic: does anyone know about any efforts using
f95 with the gnu autotools? i am using autoconf/automake with my f95
code which does the trick to some extent. the real problem is how
modules are handled. this is my other major fortran grumble. there is no
way of figuring out what module files are produced without looking into
the file and knowing the particular habits of the compiler.
i am eagerly awaiting gfortran. my code still stumbles over some
character array stuff which isn't implemented yet.
</delurk>
thanks a lot for all the brilliant work
cheers
magi
[1]: http://www-zeus.desy.de/~burow/cfortran/
--
Magnus Hagdorn
School of GeoSciences
The University of Edinburgh
Grant Institute
West Mains Road
Edinburgh EH9 3JW
Scotland
PHONE: (+44) 131 650 8523
FAX: (+44) 131 668 3184
email: Magnus.Hagdorn@glg.ed.ac.uk
web: http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/mhagdorn