This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugs

From: "Paul Thomas" <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: "Walt Brainerd" <walt at fortran dot com>
Cc: <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,"Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:34:52 +0200
Subject: Re: Bugs
References: <001301c53298$88fb8550$0100000a@Paul> <4246D0C1.3020000@fortran.com>

Hence F. But, of course, that doesn't help anybody
that is trying to implement the standard Fortran.

I know that's why you did F. One of the gfortran bug reports is the lack of -std=F. I think that we should do it sometime..... when we are on the far decay side of f77 and f95 bug reports!

I haven't used Meissner's examples as tests. That is
a good idea and I'll do it when I get through the others.

They are a very good gauge of progress with gfortran - when I tried them a year ago, less than half compiled and ran out of the boxes. Now there is only one left that doesn't. I have also tried many of John Burkhardt's and Alan Miller's programs, using the links from your site. They mostly work with no trouble. The Quetzal and Polyhedron benchmarks were a bit more difficult; there are one or two outstanding bug reports from those efforts.

Thanks for all the comments and offers to help. I'll
get cracking on the tests.

It's great that you willing to do this - the offers of help are still there.

Paul T

References:
- Re: Bugs
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: Bugs
  - From: Walt Brainerd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]