Re: notes on gfortran internals?

[Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:32:31AM +0100, FX Coudert wrote:
> >PS:  I'm starting to write up the intrinsic procedures
> >that we support in gfortran.  I have a complete list
> >of intrinsics up to this past weekend.  The document
> >will be in alphabetical order for all intrinsic names
> >and will be something along the lines:
> 
> That will be really cool!
> 
> >I will of course consult the Fortran 2003 standard (the only 
> >doc I have) and M&R.
> 
> Do you want a copy of the F95 draft? (not difficult to find, however) I 
> think F95 is much easier to read that F2003 (and it's about twice smaller!)
> 

I have a copy of the Final Committee Draft of the Fortran
2003 standard.  From a c.l.f post by Richard Maine, the
editor of F2003, I infer that the Fortran 2003 standard
and the Final Committee Draft are almost identical.  I
also have the F66 and F77 standards.  I do not have, nor
will I pay for, the actuall f95 standard.

-- 
Steve