This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678

From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>
To: Tobias SchlÃter<tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:03:14 +0100
Subject: Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
Organization: Laboratoire de Chimie Physique
References: <421DD9EF.70904@lcp.u-psud.fr> <421DDDE4.60200@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <421DE158.2080806@lcp.u-psud.fr> <421DE8F7.4050803@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

I'm still worried that there might be
places where two consecutive linebreaks have a different meaning than a single
line break, though.

I was at the beginning, but can't think of any way a \r\n could mean anything else than a Windows line break.

Also, do our output routines on windows write '\r\n' or '\n'?

'\r\n'.

(I'm not sure this is right, because your diff doesn't show which functions
the different hunks belong to, this is what -p does)

When all discussion is over, I will submit a new patch with everything in order, is that OK?

FX

References:
- Patch proposal for PR 19678
  - From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
- Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
  - From: Tobias SchlÃter
- Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
  - From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
- Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
  - From: Tobias SchlÃter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]