This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Implementing new intrinsic

From: FX Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>,GCC Fortran mailing list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:22:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Implementing new intrinsic
Organization: Laboratoire de Chimie Physique
References: <41F57C3D.5090603@lcp.u-psud.fr> <20050124232235.GA66753@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

The 2nd argument to type_check() is the number of the argument.
path1 = 0, path2 = 1.

Thanks for this info.

From a quick glance, the rest looks okay to me.
I assume you have tested your patch.

At runtime, I get an undefined reference to `_gfortran_rename_i4_sub', and libgfortran/intrinsics/rename.c has not been compiled. Is there a magic option in the make system I didn't use? (I only used ./configure --enable-languages=c,f95 && make).

--
FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementing new intrinsic
  - From: Feng Wang
- Re: Implementing new intrinsic
  - From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert

References:
- Implementing new intrinsic
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: Implementing new intrinsic
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]