This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New metabug tracking regressions from g77

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: GCC Fortran mailing list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:49:06 +0100
Subject: Re: New metabug tracking regressions from g77
References: <41DD503D.6030202@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20050106173158.GA12685@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:
> There are at least 56 unimplemented, nonstandard intrinsic
> procedures.  So, there are at least 52+56=108 known bugs.
> However, at least 2 of the 52 have been fixed, but the
> patches I submitted are in limbo.
> 
I assume you're having a list?  If so, can you attach this to PR 14994 and
rename it to "g77 intrinsics not implemented in gfortran" or similar.

Independent of that, it would also be interesting to know which of these
intrinsics can be used by simply linking with libf2c, or why this doesn't
work, in which case we might have an easier time by making gfortran compatible
with libf2c instead of porting all the individual intrinsics.

- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New metabug tracking regressions from g77
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: New metabug tracking regressions from g77
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- New metabug tracking regressions from g77
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: New metabug tracking regressions from g77
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]