This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 13 November 2004 14:27, Toon Moene wrote:
But wouldn't removing the xfail line at least concentrate our efforts on those few cases where it indeed, still, errors ?
I thought gcc policy was that the testsuite should have zero unexpected FAILs. Ie. spurious XPASSes are preferable to FAILs for known-broken tests.
You were also proposing removing the comments mentioning the related PR, which has definitely not been fixed.
It's not a regression (that particular code never worked), so IMHO it can wait in line with any other wrong-code bugs we have :(
-- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |