This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: g77 testsuite (was RE: IMPLICIT CHARACTER*# causing 35 regressions in NIST testsuite)

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>,"Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" <david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 01:14:27 +0100
Subject: Re: g77 testsuite (was RE: IMPLICIT CHARACTER*# causing 35 regressions in NIST testsuite)
Organization: CodeSourcery
References: <8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F09B359@calttsv025.cal.riotinto.org> <20040708000351.GA42621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

> One area of failures in the G77TS are the bit manipulation functions
> (eg, IBSET).  gfortran only supports these functions with default
> integer kind while the G77TS has tests for INTEGER*1, INTEGER*2, and
> INTEGER*8.

I wasn't aware of this. The backend implementations in trans-intrinsic.c 
should work with any integer kind.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: g77 testsuite (was RE: IMPLICIT CHARACTER*# causing 35 regressions in NIST testsuite)
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- g77 testsuite (was RE: IMPLICIT CHARACTER*# causing 35 regressions in NIST testsuite)
  - From: Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
- Re: g77 testsuite (was RE: IMPLICIT CHARACTER*# causing 35 regressions in NIST testsuite)
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]