This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Cc: Bud Davis <bdavis9659 at comcast dot net>, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:05:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN
References: <1086567830.31849.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200406121314.29922.paul@codesourcery.com> <1087130998.12374.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40DDB79C.8020301@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:51:24PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Bud Davis wrote:
> > freebsd was getting test fails after this was committed. seems that
> > isinf() is not the same between glibc and freebsd's libc.
> > 
> > added a check to explicitly check the sign for infinity.
> > 

I checked with the freebsd-standards mailinglist and FreeBSD's
isinf() is a C99 conforming implementation.  That is, isinf()
is not required to return the sign.  I suspect this problem
will be found on OpenBSD and NetBSD.  The patch should be
committed.

-- 
Steve

References:
- [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN
  - From: Bud Davis
- Re: [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN
  - From: Bud Davis
- Re: [gfortran] patch for pr12839 / F2003 format of Inf and NaN
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]