This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LAPACK: good news and bad news

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 17:49:28 -0700
Subject: Re: LAPACK: good news and bad news
References: <20040613203230.GA14010@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <40CCEF20.2060508@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:19:44AM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> 
> [ adding gcc@gcc.gnu.org as this might be of general interest; for those 
> who are not in the know, the DOUBLE COMPLEX version of BLAS used to fail 
> its tests until not long ago, the new failure Steve discusses below is 
> now PR 15982 ]
> 

Actually, both COMPLEX and DOUBLE COMPLEX failed in that
the BLAS test programs reported "suspicious" results.  The
The failures occurred in the level 2 and 3 routines.  The
level test program for CHER, CHER2, ZHER, and ZHER2 failed,
but it is sufficiently complicated that I haven't isolated
a test case.

-- 
Steve

References:
- LAPACK: good news and bad news
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: LAPACK: good news and bad news
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]