This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] Implementation SYSTEM_CLOCK intrinsic subroutine


On Friday 14 May 2004 17:26, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:34:19PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> > Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >   program a          ! system_clock requires at least 1 of its
> > >   call system_clock  ! optional arguments to be present.
> > >   end program a
> >
> > I don't see that this is true. The standard says that each of these
> > arguments are optional, and there is no constraint that one be present,
> > as in the case of SELECTED_REAL_KIND for instance. Of course the call
> > doesn't make much sense if no arguments are given.
>
> Yikes.  You are right.  The standard does not mandate that
> one of the optional arguments is required.  In fact, NAG's
> compiler will compile the above without a problem, and the
> executable runs.  I think I'll need to update the resolving
> routine and if no arguments are present, then point at a
> __system_clock_nop internal routine.

Why bother? The existing routine should do the right thing (ie nothing).

Paul


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]