This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gfortran or tree-ssa bug?

> I assumed that gfortran implicitly set the target
> to 0 due to the underflow.  At least, my test showed
> that it did.

Nope. The frontend simplification routines assume any error means "I can't 
touch this, so use the original value". The subtraction gets folded by the 
backend folders later on, but we need to handle this in the frontend.

The output of -fdump-parse-tree shows the subtraction is still there.

I'm basically suggesting we remove ARITH_UNDERFLOW altogether.

Paul
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]