This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: initialized equivalence (was: dumping trees with g77 ?)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Victor Leikehman <lei at haifasphere dot co dot il>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:03:01 -0800
Subject: Re: initialized equivalence (was: dumping trees with g77 ?)
References: <403C9405.7000307@haifasphere.co.il> <200402251234.02122.paul@codesourcery.com> <403C9D61.5020604@haifasphere.co.il>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Victor Leikehman wrote:
> This seems to me less straightforward because common/equivalence blocks
> are currently translated to unions, and union fields can't be
> initialized in C.

Yes they can.

	union U { int i; double d; };
	union U u = { .d = 1.0 };


r~

References:
- dumping trees with g77 ?
  - From: Victor Leikehman
- Re: dumping trees with g77 ?
  - From: Paul Brook
- initialized equivalence (was: dumping trees with g77 ?)
  - From: Victor Leikehman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]