This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: standard specifiers ...
- From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Lars Segerlund <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:45:34 +0000
- Subject: Re: standard specifiers ...
- Organization: CodeSourcery
- References: <20040120140848.01ab6659.lars.segerlund@comsys.se>
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 1:08 pm, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> Am I totally off or should we perhaps introduce a couple of 'standard
> specifiers' for f77 / g77 in gfortran.h ? ( along with GFC_STD_GNU,
> GFC_STD_F2003, GFC_STD_F2003_DEL, GFC_STD_F2003_OBS, GFC_STD_F95_DEL,
> GFC_STD_F95_OBS ) ?
That depends what would they represent. For f77, no. For g77 specific
extension to f77 maybe, although they could just go under STD_GNU.
If/when we implement things like cray pointers they would be definite
candidates for their own flags.
See my previous message on a similar subject:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-01/msg00050.html
> This would certainly make fx. INTRINSIC MODULES and such much easier to
> work with.
I don't understand. Aren't intrinsic modules a f2003 feature?
Paul