This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: compatibility problem with GO TO statement
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: "'Paul Brook '" <paul at codesourcery dot com>, "'Feng Wang '" <wf_cs at yahoo dot com>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 09:34:27 -0800
- Subject: Re: compatibility problem with GO TO statement
- References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F37402@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl>
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:08:37PM +0100, S. Bosscher wrote:
> > As we seem to be implementing more nonstandard/deleted features I'm
> > also adding a machanism for specifying which standard the compiler
> > should conform to.
>
> Excelent, I had just put that on my TODO list.
> (Every time I do, someone else is already working on it ;-)
> We can then work on other simple things that make us less
> f77-incompatible (such as PAUSE) and also hide ASSIGN and
> such for f9x. May I suggest we use -std=.... as a flag to
> control the standard we use?
>
It may also be appropriate to permit deleted features
when compiling foo.f as oppose to foo.f90.
--
Steve