This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [rfc] rewrite of local equivalences
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Arnaud Desitter <arnaud dot desitter at ouce dot ox dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:14:04 -0800
- Subject: Re: [rfc] rewrite of local equivalences
- References: <20031127042950.GA581@twiddle.net> <010201c3b4e2$bc97a810$d92601a3@ouce.ox.ac.uk>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:34:01PM -0000, Arnaud Desitter wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran
> Cc: <jason@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 4:29 AM
> Subject: [rfc] rewrite of local equivalences
>
>
> >
> > I'm somewhat concerned that there are almost no test cases for
> > equivalence in the test suite, so I have no idea what happens
> > here for corner cases.
>
> Maybe the NIST Fortran 77 test suite could be included in
> the GCC tree along the lines of what has been done for the
> ADA test suite. Note that this suite has only positive tests.
> http://www.fortran-2000.com/ArnaudRecipes/fcvs21_f95.html
> I am not sure what the license implications are though
> (see http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/ctg/softagre.htm).
>
The g77 testsuite contains 68 uses of EQUIVALENCE.
Note, these will not cover its use inside a MODULE.
--
Steve