This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: max-stack-var-size

From: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>
To: canqun at nudt dot edu dot cn, S.Bosscher <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:47:59 +0000
Subject: Re: max-stack-var-size
References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F373D6@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl> <200311061942.48967.paul@nowt.org> <20031107075823.5C7885A79C@ds20.nudt.edu.cn>

On Friday 07 November 2003 7:58 am, canqun@nudt.edu.cn wrote:
> It seems that recursive function is the only case that
> its local variables should be placed on stack. Is it
> true? If so, add an extra condition to avoid such case
> will let it work.
>
> +   /* Keep variables larger than max-stack-var-size
> off stack.  */
> +   if (!(sym->ns->proc_name->attr.recursive)
>         && !gfc_can_put_var_on_stack (DECL_SIZE_UNIT
> (decl)))
> +     TREE_STATIC (decl) = 1;

This would be fine, preferably accompanied by a testcase.

Paul

References:
- RE: max-stack-var-size
  - From: S. Bosscher
- Re: max-stack-var-size
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: max-stack-var-size
  - From: canqun

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]