From gcc-patches-return-73081-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org Fri Nov 29 14:44:53 2002
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-73081-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Received: (qmail 32219 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2002 14:44:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help at gcc dot gnu dot org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner at gcc dot gnu dot org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Received: (qmail 32207 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 14:44:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tornado.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources dot redhat dot com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 14:44:49 -0000
Received: from tornado.toronto.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tornado dot toronto dot redhat dot com (8 dot 12 dot 5/8 dot 12 dot 5) with ESMTP id gATEimXm009186;
	Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:44:48 -0500
Received: (from dnovillo@localhost)
	by tornado dot toronto dot redhat dot com (8 dot 12 dot 5/8 dot 12 dot 5/Submit) id gATEilrF009184;
	Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:44:47 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:44:47 -0500
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Fix format in c-call-graph
Message-ID: <20021129144447.GC9111@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
References: <u8u1i0ix1t.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <u8u1i0ix1t dot fsf at gromit dot moeb>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Organization: Red Hat Canada

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> The appended patch fixes this warning:
> /cvs/gcc-tree-ssa-20020619-branch/gcc/c-call-graph.c:124: warning: int format, double arg (arg 6)
> 
> Ok to commit? Or should the output really be an int - I'll commit then
> the other version.
> 
I believe the output really is a double.  Sébastian?


Diego.