From gcc-patches-return-71236-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue Nov 05 01:54:27 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Received: (qmail 16361 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 01:54:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help at gcc dot gnu dot org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner at gcc dot gnu dot org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Received: (qmail 16291 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2002 01:54:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06bw.bigpond.com) (139.134.6.96) by sources dot redhat dot com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2002 01:54:24 -0000 Received: from bubble.local ([144.135.24.81]) by mta06bw dot bigpond dot com (Netscape Messaging Server 4 dot 15 mta06bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H52YMM00 dot J0P for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:54:22 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-136-184-243.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.184.243]) by bwmam05.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 44/35495068); 05 Nov 2002 11:54:22 Received: (qmail 21870 invoked by uid 179); 5 Nov 2002 01:54:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 12:24:21 +1030 From: Alan Modra To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: geoffk at geoffk dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Subject: Re: libgcc2 __fixsfdi Message-ID: <20021105015421.GA967@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , geoffk at geoffk dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org References: <200211050055.BAA06008@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211050055 dot BAA06008 at faui11 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:55:41AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Alan Modra wrote: > > * defaults.h (FLOAT_FIX_BOUND_OVERFLOW): Define > > (FLOAT_FIX_NANS_TO_ZERO): Define. > > Hmm, I just noticed that. I guess this would allow me to get > rid of the weird hack that is s390/fixdfdi.h ... Yes, it should do. I see an extra expand_fix hunk (4782,4791) crept into my posted patch. Please ignore that one. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre