From gcc-bugs-return-49714-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu Jan 23 23:25:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org Received: (qmail 4418 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 23:25:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help at gcc dot gnu dot org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner at gcc dot gnu dot org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org Received: (qmail 4405 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 23:25:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by 172 dot 16 dot 49 dot 205 with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 23:25:42 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost dot gnu dot org with esmtp (Exim 4 dot 10) id 18bqj7-0007ok-00 for bug-gcc at prep dot ai dot mit dot edu; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:25:41 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18bqim-0006d7-00 for bug-gcc at prep dot ai dot mit dot edu; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:25:21 -0500 Received: from mail.cis.ohio-state.edu ([164.107.115.5] helo=cis.ohio-state.edu) by monty-python dot gnu dot org with esmtp (Exim 4 dot 10 dot 13) id 18bqi1-0005nf-00 for bug-gcc at prep dot ai dot mit dot edu; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:24:33 -0500 Received: from mta05bw.bigpond.com (mta05bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.95]) by cis dot ohio-state dot edu (8 dot 11 dot 6/8 dot 11 dot 6) with ESMTP id h0NNOLM13165 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:24:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from bubble.local ([144.135.24.69]) by mta05bw dot bigpond dot com (Netscape Messaging Server 4 dot 15 mta05bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H96X0D00 dot BQF for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:24:13 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-136-186-91.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.186.91]) by bwmam01.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 8/41418345); 24 Jan 2003 09:24:13 Received: (qmail 18599 invoked by uid 179); 23 Jan 2003 23:24:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:54:13 +1030 From: Alan Modra To: Manuel Serrano Cc: Pop =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastian?= , gnu-gcc-bug at cis dot ohio-state dot edu Subject: Re: Extremelly long link times with gcc3.x Message-ID: <20030123232412.GG949@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> References: <20030123085426.GA22029@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> <20030123095136.688d2772.Manuel.Serrano@sophia.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030123095136 dot 688d2772 dot Manuel dot Serrano at sophia dot inria dot fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2 dot 41 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:51:36AM +0100, Manuel Serrano wrote: > > Could you link without "-g" debugging symbols and report the link time? > Ooops, I have forgotten to add this time. Adding/removing -g flag does not > change the link time. In other words, it is more or less the same thing > with or without -g. Without -g it last 1096 seconds. Sorry. I'm curious as to where ld is spinning. Can you use gdb to attach to a running ld, somewhere around the halfway mark, and report a backtrace? -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre