From gcc-return-55081-listarch-gcc=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org Fri Jun 14 10:25:21 2002
Return-Path: <gcc-return-55081-listarch-gcc=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Received: (qmail 21063 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2002 10:25:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
List-Help: <http://gcc dot gnu dot org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner at gcc dot gnu dot org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Received: (qmail 20973 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2002 10:25:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.237)
  by sources dot redhat dot com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2002 10:25:15 -0000
Received: from talisman.cambridge.redhat.com (talisman.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.81])
	by executor dot cambridge dot redhat dot com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A2C3DABAFC; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:25:13 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from rsandifo@localhost)
	by talisman dot cambridge dot redhat dot com (8 dot 11 dot 6/8 dot 11 dot 0) id g5EAP7U28314;
	Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:25:07 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: talisman dot cambridge dot redhat dot com: rsandifo set sender to rsandifo at redhat dot com using -f
To: "Kaveh R dot  Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
Subject: Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
References: <200206131529.LAA09532@caip.rutgers.edu>
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
Date: 14 Jun 2002 11:25:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200206131529 dot LAA09532 at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Message-ID: <wvnr8ja17jw.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
> The GCC Steering Committee was asked to consider dropping traditional
> (K&R) C support in the GCC sources and allow converting everything to
> ISO C.  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00337.html

Sorry if I've missed it, but is there a list of what changes you mean?
Or is that still to be decided?

Like, is it just removing PARAMS for now?  Or are we going to start
using new-style function declarations?  Convert boolean parameters
to 'bool' instead of 'int'?

Richard