Bug 32834 - [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
[Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures
Status: NEW
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: fortran
4.3.0
: P3 normal
: ---
Assigned To: Not yet assigned to anyone
: meta-bug
Depends on: 34640 35718 44735 47359 56867 57023 19925 29396 29606 30625 30871 30964 31197 31205 31211 31213 31214 31217 31229 31258 31487 31564 31608 31609 31879 32129 32594 32682 32703 32710 32760 32867 32875 32881 32903 32906 32928 32962 33139 33152 33162 33241 33288 33317 33334 33337 33370 33499 33541 33566 33636 33686 33689 33749 33759 33811 33818 33881 33888 33897 33941 33957 33998 34008 34084 34137 34192 34209 34231 34248 34262 34335 34359 34370 34396 34404 34429 34431 34432 34438 34471 34476 34530 34537 34540 34545 34556 34557 34558 34559 34560 34564 34565 34566 34672 34704 34759 34760 34763 34782 34784 34785 34820 34838 34861 34875 34876 34945 34946 34955 35001 35184 35470 35681 35698 35723 35769 35770 35820 35837 35840 35846 35945 36091 36167 36214 36374 36454 36746 36886 37099 37193 37199 37274 37411 37445 37597 37614 37626 37723 37749 37787 37836 37926 38065 38135 38471 38538 38594 38657 38665 38669 38672 38852 38859 38883 38887 38907 38914 38915 38917 38918 39006 39295 39304 39528 40018 40443 40551 40822 40847 40848 41044 41278 41478 41479 41515 41772 41777 41869 42008 42481 42650 42684 42851 42888 42936 42999 43040 43532 45338 45489 45777 46638 47051 47154 47348 47844 48831 49648 49755 50327
Blocks: 42361
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-07-20 08:13 UTC by Joost VandeVondele
Modified: 2013-04-21 11:28 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2007-07-20 12:25:13


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 08:13:24 UTC
This meta-bug tries to list all rejects-valid and ice-on-valid-code that can be triggered with standard Fortran 95 conforming code, are not arch specific, and can not reasonably be called a limit of the compiler. In full agreement with pault, I think fixing these should be a priority.
Comment 1 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 08:20:26 UTC
only 1 open since 2005, 2 open since 2006, others are 2007.
Comment 2 Thomas Koenig 2007-07-20 16:42:10 UTC
Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?
Comment 3 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 17:02:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?

no, I overlooked that keyword, and they belong to this category (though I'll again  ignore arch specific ones). I'll add them to the list shortly. 
Comment 4 Joost VandeVondele 2007-07-20 17:17:23 UTC
from the 19 wrong code bugs I've only retained 8 that I judged as user visible, F95, and triggered without additional options.