Bug 27929 - RoundRectangle2D buglet
Summary: RoundRectangle2D buglet
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: classpath
Classification: Unclassified
Component: awt (show other bugs)
Version: 0.92
: P3 minor
Target Milestone: 0.93
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-07 12:46 UTC by Norman Hendrich
Modified: 2006-09-21 07:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2006-09-19 16:26:48

Attachments
screenshot showing RoundRect2D.FLOAT under cacao+classpath (42.03 KB, image/gif)
2006-06-07 12:47 UTC, Norman Hendrich 		Details
screenshot showing RoundRect2D under JDK 1.4.2 (19.44 KB, image/gif)
2006-06-07 12:47 UTC, Norman Hendrich 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Norman Hendrich 2006-06-07 12:46:01 UTC 
Another corner-case bug: the rendering of rounded rectangles is broken when the corner radius gets large (i.e. larger than the width/height of the rectangle itself). The JDK falls back to a kind of ellipse in those cases. See attached screenshots for a few examples rendered with cacao+classpath and JDK 1.4.2.
Comment 1 Norman Hendrich 2006-06-07 12:47:00 UTC 
Created attachment 11624 [details]
screenshot showing RoundRect2D.FLOAT under cacao+classpath
Comment 2 Norman Hendrich 2006-06-07 12:47:32 UTC 
Created attachment 11625 [details]
screenshot showing RoundRect2D under JDK 1.4.2
Comment 3 david.gilbert 2006-09-19 16:26:48 UTC 
This bug also shows up in Swing applications that use the LiquidLookAndFeel[1], specifically in the title of JInternalFrame components.

[1] https://liquidlnf.dev.java.net/
Comment 4 david.gilbert 2006-09-20 13:34:16 UTC 
I committed a fix for this bug:

2006-09-20  David Gilbert  <david.gilbert@object-refinery.com>

	* java/awt/geom/RoundRectangle2D.java:
	(getPathIterator): Reimplemented,
	and updated various API doc comments.
Comment 5 Norman Hendrich 2006-09-21 07:49:16 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)

Confirmed fixed (tested with dashed, dotted, dash-dotted lines, too).
Thanks!