Bug 15502 - [meta-bug] bugs needed for SPEC CPU 2K and 2K6 and 95
Summary: [meta-bug] bugs needed for SPEC CPU 2K and 2K6 and 95
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: fortran (show other bugs)
Version: 4.0.0
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords: meta-bug
Depends on: 12840 13082 13152 13249 13257 13278 13742 14976 15364 15530 16919 17073 17075 17144 17298 17709 17917 18108 18157 18218 18752 18890 19017 19358 19359 19479 19482 20244 21063 23634 23922 24793 25416 25619 26038 26041 26106 26136 26357 26891 27662
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-05-17 20:00 UTC by Andrew Pinski
Modified: 2006-06-01 19:19 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2005-04-16 17:19:09

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Pinski 2004-05-17 20:00:32 UTC 
Just a meta bug for the bug reports needed to be fixed to run tests in SPEC CPU
Comment 1 Andrew Pinski 2004-05-17 20:01:11 UTC 
Confirmed, just add more on.
Comment 2 Andrew Pinski 2005-11-02 21:13:37 UTC 
Note there are still some more 2k5/6 SPEC blocking bugs which just had not been filed yet.
Comment 3 Thomas Koenig 2005-11-05 21:53:51 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Note there are still some more 2k5/6 SPEC blocking bugs which just had not been
> filed yet.

Well, can anybody file them?  I don't have access to the SPEC suite.
Comment 4 Andrew Pinski 2006-01-01 05:48:09 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well, can anybody file them?  I don't have access to the SPEC suite.
Almost nobody has acess to SPEC 2k6 since it has not been released officially yet.
Comment 5 Tobias Schlüter 2006-01-10 00:12:03 UTC 
All dependencies have been fixed.  Closing.  If anybody ever gets access to new SPEC sources, they're free to open a new one.
Comment 6 Andrew Pinski 2006-01-23 18:15:09 UTC 
Reopening as a new one came in.
Comment 7 Paul Thomas 2006-06-01 19:19:07 UTC 
I think that this one can be declared well and truly gone.... for the time being.

Paul